Sunday, April 14, 2019
Health and Social Care Essay Example for Free
Health and Social C argon EssayOur social movement was a do drugss compress our main aim was to inform mickle on drugs and what effects it nooky have and to not stereotype drug users as they can be anyone. M2- Positive influences I felt up our group were real well prepared as we had a nigh(a) use of resources. This included plenty of leaflets to give bulge start on drugs to inform people on the effectiveness on drugs. We also had a laptop with the bawl out to blunt game on it avail satis incidentory for people to play, and other drugs game activities that were available for people to exhaust interpreter in. We also gave out straitsnaires and cakes which rewarded those for taking part.We also had plenty of space to set up the send back and all(a)(a) the activities. This was great as not having enough space would have meant not being able to set up all the activities we made. We also, had plenty of time as we had a good time time slot of 2 hours between 11 1 to im plement the campaign. This gave much time for us to hand out questionnaires and inform and teach much people on the effects of drugs. We all took part as in the campaign as we were guided in the stereotyping activity where we all attached signs to us asking do you think I take drugs? where we asked people with regarding what we looked to like to whether we took drugs or not.Read more Identify ship canal of working that can help improve partnership workingessayThis involved us fecundation up in particular clothes which seemed to be rattling effective rather than showing pictures of people. I intend we also taught lots to people as many a(prenominal) people were shocked at the reading gave to them especially astir(predicate) the legal highs activity. Negative influences I felt we didnt all equally participate in preparation as the questionnaire and research I made were not used and a various questionnaire was made.This in effect made it seem as if my contribution was not ne cessary. I also, felt that I didnt take part in setting up the campaign as the show tasks went to other group members. However, the campaign involved marking up as characters and I believe that we all did a good job of dressing up except certain members of the group didnt dress up as they should of as originally, we had the plan of psyche dressing up in a turn to show that your appearance doesnt affect whether taking drugs or not.This was grievous as not that were we raising awareness we were teaching about tereotypes. Also, the people that came to the campaign didnt engage in all activities as we hoped as there was so many to take part in and so much(prenominal) teaching to give out. Also, our tar piss audience were teenagers as there was evidence most drug users were approximately this age However, mostly adults came. I felt we had a limited audience and not as many people as we thought came to the campaign and a lot of the people had learning disabilities in which we w erent prepared for and didnt cater for.M3 Ethical issues One of the main ethical issues in our campaign was confidentiality.Confidentiality is important as during the campaign somebody may come forwards and confide in you about drugs or there drug intake and it is important that confidentiality is not breached and that persons name is not discussed and their secretiveness is kept. As we gave out questionnaires, they were kept anonymous so therefore, all information received from the campaign can be kept confidential as one of the questions was Do you know anyone that takes drugs which although this was a closed question it was quite personal and anyone answering might of felt uncomfortable if the questionnaire was to ask your name.This then links to risk-free guarding. During the campaign no one came forward with any information that could of leash them to be unsafe However, it was important that information we gave out was correct and that we werent giving false information whi ch could lead someone to risk of exposure when taking drugs. This I felt we did successfully as all research given out was from drug websites such as Talk to Frank. Also, other ethical issues include choice and own beliefs. I believe that when giving out information we didnt preach any of our own beliefs to anyone. It was completely factual.As this could of lead someone to life uncomfortable as everybody has the right to choose whether they take drugs or not and if it is important that when teaching that you are not preaching your beliefs about people taking drugs as this could lead to offend someone who is taking them. Finally, it is important to not ask any inappropriate questions as this could lead to someone feeling uncomfortable. All personal questions that needed to be asked during our campaign were on an anonymous questionnaire which didnt involve any questioning from anybody from our group.Therefore, making people feel comfortable in answering. Other questions asked by us were do you think I look like the type of person that takes drugs? as we were dressed up as characters. However, this question was asked after we explained that we were dressed up as characters as part of the campaign so people felt comfortable in answering without offending. Also, the question would you like a cake? for those who didnt want to take part in any of the activities. D2 During our campaign we gave out questionnaires after people took part in the activities.However, single 32 people answered the questionnaire. According to the questionnaire 22 people out of 32 knew someone who takes drugs that left only ten people who didnt know anyone who took drugs. According to the Shropshire star 16 topical anaesthetic Shrewsbury men had a powerful and overbearing influence on others in the drugs chain and was said to be taking ? 15,000 a month from the trade. Phoenix Car centre was aware of the extent of drugs operation and compete significant part in getting drugs to the st reet of Shrewsbury under orders from other people.Some of these men are parents to teenagers in Shrewsbury and therefore, it is possible that some of the people that filled out the questionnaire knew these men. http//www. shropshirestar. com/news/2013/03/03/how-police-smashed-shropshire-drugs-cartel/ Also, 28 out of 32 people were made more aware of the effects of drugs after the campaign whereas only 4 people didnt. This could of meant that they already knew about the effects drugs had on someone or they didnt feel out campaign gave much information on the effects drugs have one someone. However, more than three quarters did develop out more about the effects of drugs which is positive.This could suggest that existing campaigns arent using the correct technique as we did to inform people on the effects of drugs. Talk to Frank is a website that only offers online information and a call centre in which people are able to access to talk about drugs. However, although our campaign us ed most of the Talk to Frank information we implemented it in a different way which was more effective to informing people on the effects of drugs. Since 2011 the Talk to Frank website has had a 6% increase in feedback Therefore, It could suggest that people are using the website a lot more than previously.This could be why some people didnt learn anymore about the effects of drugs and as our campaign was implemented directly through explaining we were able to teach more people about the effects. http//www. clear-uk. org/talk-to-frank-is-back/ 29 out of 32 people found out more information about drugs after the campaign was implemented. This meant that only 3 people didnt learn anything from the campaign. This could have meant that they already knew or that our campaign wasnt very informative. However 29 people did find it informative, which is more than 3 quarters of the people that were involved.Therefore, I feel as though our campaign did inform people well. Also, when questioned how useful the campaign was statistics show that 19 people thought our campaign was really good 11 people thought it was good and only 2 people thought it was average. And nobody felt our campaign was poor or really poor. Therefore, more than half thought out campaign was really good and useful and the rest thought it was good or average. This is positive results. Overall, our campaign results are very positive. This means that our campaign was very beneficial.I feel that our campaign went really well due to the positive feedback that we got of the audience. This is proved with results from our questionnaire which we gave to the audience to get their personal opinions on how well our campaign was to them. When giving out the questionnaire I felt we were present and observant when the questionnaire was filled out. Therefore, I feel that the results we got back from the questionnaire may be slightly warped due to people not absentminded to be judged or questioned about their answer s if they were negative as although it was anonymous it was very overt.Other campaigns use the questionnaire online and get feedback from the public, such as the Talk to Frank website and if I were to do the campaign again I would drop by the wayside people to step aside to fill in their questionnaire and ask them to put it into a box I feel this covert way of gathering information is much better as it gives the public seclusion which makes them able to write down their real thoughts and opinions about the campaign and not put answers to be polite. However, I felt our campaign nformation was as good as Talk to Frank as we had the talk to Frank games available and we were able to use a good range of information from the Talk to Frank website to puzzle out awareness about the effects of drugs. http//www. talktofrank. com/? gclid=CLf-1dOy6bcCFQ3KtAod_Q4AnA A National campaign launched by the Australian government in 2011-2012 also used public speaking and posters to communicate to the public about the awareness of drugs and it was also very effective for them.They also collected results from their campaign on how it affected certain people and how it has made a difference for these certain people, how theyve become more aware of drugs and the dangers, how they now feel about drugs and if they would ever blast to take drugs. Which is slightly different from our campaign questionnaire but it is still the same method of gathering information and still very similar to the way in which we implemented our campaign. http//www. drugs. health. gov. au/internet/drugs/publishing. sf/content/campaign4 This proved very good in some aspects as there has been an increase in showing that drugs are harmful and helping people avoid using drugs which is very similar to our campaign in the fact it is bringing awareness by showing that drugs are bad and harmful by looking and there effects. Also, other statistics show that more adults are talking more to their children about sub stances after the campaign which again is bringing awareness and also promote two way communications.